The Preservation League Responds to Governor Cuomo's Proposed FY 2022 Budget
Historic preservation is woven throughout Governor Cuomo’s proposed FY 2022 New York State Budget. We appreciate his continued support of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation and the New York State Council on the Arts, as well as his leadership during these challenging times.
While we did not see mention of our NYS Historic Tax Credit, which has been a proven stimulus mechanism federally and in New York State, we are glad to work with our NYS Legislature to improve this important program that leads to job creation, increased rehabilitation, and additional community investment. In Federal Fiscal Year 2019, the Historic Tax Credit created over 8,600 jobs, with $520 million of rehabilitation investment generating over $151 million in federal, state, and local tax revenue. Last year in NYS a job was created for every $12,000 of Historic Tax Credit investment, or $60,450 of rehabilitation. Every $0.20 spent on the Historic Tax Credit created $1.40 in earned income. As part of economic recovery, an increase in our NYS Historic Tax Credit from 20% to 30% of qualified rehabilitation costs for projects under $2.5 million will create community revitalization, sustainable economic growth, and the protection of historic buildings and landscapes. The timeline of Historic Tax Credit projects means that while the investment will be immediate, the fiscal impact to our state will not occur until FY 2023-24, at the earliest.
Preservation and Affordable Housing
Governor Cuomo noted the importance of tax credits in restarting our economy and helping communities recover from the pandemic. We could not agree more and were pleased to see the Governor extend the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, providing an additional $400 million over five years. The NYS and Federal Historic Tax Credit has been a key partner with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, providing affordable housing throughout New York State. Since 2011, the Historic Tax Credit program has incentivized 3,619 units of affordable housing, a third of all housing units receiving Historic Tax Credit incentives. Our NYS Historic Tax Credit program has helped drive affordable housing development in Upstate New York (86% of the affordable housing receiving Historic Tax Credits) and in economically distressed neighborhoods in New York City.
Capital Investment at OPRHP and DEC
The Governor’s proposed investment in capital projects at both OPRHP and DEC are greatly appreciated, in particular the focus on our New York State Historic Sites, as well as historic buildings and structures located within our NYS Parks. We know that OPRHP is in the midst of a systemwide survey of buildings within its parks, which will help inform their capital program. This survey could also help with expansion of future public/private partnerships and park investment.
Environmental Protection Fund
The Preservation League supports the renewal of the Environmental Protection Fund at $300 million and notes the significance of the historic preservation grants. The crucial historic preservation projects funded through the EPF include municipal and nonprofit restoration of courthouses, town halls, libraries, historic houses of worship that frequently serve multiple functions, and nonprofit arts and cultural centers. These grants then leverage private fundraising to preserve community anchors and centers of cultural tourism.
Renewable Energy and Environment
The Preservation League believes in the importance of renewable energy to ensure a sustainable future and fight climate change. We also believe that renewable energy and sensitivity to our state’s culturally significant places can work together as complementary goals. As our state develops a standard methodology for assessment of wind and solar project impacts, we trust that the state will continue to follow our NYS and Federal Historic Preservation Acts, avoiding impacts to National Register-eligible and listed cultural and historic resources.
Proposed infrastructure investment and large-scale new development in New York City must also take our NYS and Federal Historic Preservation Acts into consideration. Demolition of a single standard Main Street building (25 feet by 120 feet deep) negates the environmental benefit of recycling over 1.3 million aluminum cans. The Governor’s proposed Empire Station District will be one of the largest demolition and urban renewal projects in recent history. In addition to the landfill and associated greenhouse gas impact of demolition, construction of new buildings accounts for 25% of that building’s carbon emissions. Operational carbon produced by existing buildings can be reduced with energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy, whereas new construction has a locked-in carbon emissions due to building material manufacturing, material transport, and the construction process. In the interest of environmental sustainability and historic preservation, we urge the state to consider rehabilitation and reuse of the historic buildings surrounding Penn Station, in particular those that qualify for the State and National Register of Historic Places.
Reimagine the Canals
The Governor proposes a FY 2022 $40 million investment in “economic development and climate resilience and sustainability projects along the canal to stimulate tourism and recreational activity, restore wetlands, and provide grants to farmers to develop irrigation systems that access canal waters for the production of high-value crops.”
The power of our New York State Canal System is rooted in its history, authenticity as a continuously operating end-to-end canal system, vibrancy, and ability to leverage tourism now and in the future. We welcome the opportunity to work with the New York Power Authority to capitalize on this history of success for the benefit of all New Yorkers, in a way that makes it more inviting to boaters, protects its functional infrastructure, and grows its connection to the many vibrant and active waterfront communities.
Interventions proposed in the Reimagine the Canals report, if not done in a way that closely follows the New Yok State Historic Preservation Act and the National Historic Preservation Act, could significantly diminish the historical integrity of our National Historic Landmark NYS Canal System, limiting its use as a navigable waterway. Furthermore, we suggest that before valuable funds are spent to study those environmental issues, a full and thorough review of the extensive prior studies takes place, with consideration given to their findings before moving forward. We would like to call the Legislature’s attention to the many previously-produced reports on important environmental issues such as Aquatic Invasive Species, Mohawk River watershed restoration, and flooding throughout the Mohawk Valley. We believe the best use of NYS funds would incorporate the findings and recommendations of those reports issued by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation as part of the Mohawk River Basin Action Agenda.
We believe that the best future for our NYS Canal System lies in capitalizing on its authenticity as the oldest, continuously-operating canal system in the nation. We also hope that the proposed renaming of our Erie Canal Corridor as the “Empire Line” is reconsidered, as the Erie Canal is one of New York State’s most authentic and iconic landmarks. I would imagine we would no sooner wish to rename the Erie Canal than we would Niagara Falls or the Brooklyn Bridge.
The Preservation League shared these thoughts in our 2021 Environmental Conservation Joint Budget Hearing Testimony on Wednesday, January 27.