Open Letter to the Governer re: Penn Station General Project Plan

September 25, 2023

The Honorable Kathy Hochul
Governor of New York State
NYS State Capitol Building
Albany, New York 12224

Dear Governor Hochul:

The undersigned organizations all agree with you: New York needs a world-class Penn Station. The Station is vital to the City and region’s economy. Its users, and all New Yorkers, need to know that they are getting the station that the City, State, and region deserves.

Penn should welcome residents, commuters, and visitors with an excellent experience and abundant transit capacity. This is clearly the moment when that goal can be achieved. But there is conflicting information, and confusion, about what is happening and what could happen at Penn. With so much public money involved, we believe the public deserves full transparency and explanation on several issues.

Penn Station Design: Will there be a public bidding process for the design? Will the State comment on the other designs that have been made public? The MTA has announced its own plan. How would that coordinate with a new design? With the future of Madison Square Garden’s location in question, how will any plan accommodate for its potential move?     

Transit Improvements: Many experts support through-running to expand capacity, but prior documents from the railroads have dismissed it as not feasible. Yet, another analysis of through running is being conducted now by the railroads. The public deserves a full explanation of why it is or isn’t suitable, with all studies released in full to the public, including detailed information about their methodologies. 

General Project Plan: While we acknowledge the recent decision by State Supreme Court Judge Billings dismissing challenges to the GPP, there is still confusion. You publicly “decoupled” the GPP from Penn improvements. Yet Judge Billings’decision noted that Empire State Development said the State is in talks with Vornado about certain sites. To what benefit, if there is no longer a connection to Penn? Why does the State still keep the GPP when other plans for Penn do not?

 Why has the GPP not been withdrawn?

The loss of historic Penn Station left a scar that generations have tried to heal. If this is the moment when this loss is rectified, New Yorkers must be a part of that discussion. We look forward to a robust public dialogue that leads to the Station which New York needs and deserves.

Respectfully,

Art Deco Society
City Club
CNU NYC
Community Board 5
Council of Chelsea Block Associations
Environmental Simulation Center
Historic Districts Council
Human Scale NYC
Limited Equity and Affordability at Penn South (LEAPS)
MidTown South Community Council
Murray Hill Neighborhood Association
New York Landmarks Conservancy
Penn Area Residents Committee
Preservation League of New York State
ReThinkNYC
Save Chelsea
Take Back NYC
29th Street Block Association
Union Square Community Coalition
Untapped New York
Victorian Society

PLNYS Staff
Re: Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, 229-231 West 14th Street, Manhattan

The League was pleased to co-sign this letter written by our colleagues at Village Preservation in support of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church. To learn more about their advocacy around this historic site, please visit their website.

September 8, 2023

Hon. Sarah Carroll, Chair Landmarks Preservation Commission
1 Centre Street, 9th floor
New York, NY 10007

Re: Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, 229-231 West 14th Street, Manhattan

Dear Chair Carroll,

We write in reply to the letter Village Preservation received from the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) on August 3, 2023, in response to the Request for Evaluation of Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (229-231 West 14th Street).

The undersigned elected officials, scholars of Hispanic history and culture, and representatives of Manhattan Community Board 4, preservation organizations, and neighborhood groups, are collectively disappointed by the response from the LPC regarding the request to evaluate the merits of the presently-endangered church as a potential individual landmark. In the aforementioned response letter, LPC failed to recognize the significance of the church and the congregation it served for a century.

In 1902, Our Lady of Guadalupe Church was founded at 229-231 West 14th Street, two ca. 1850 singlefamily brownstone-clad houses that were built as stately homes at a time when 14th Street was one of the most prestigious addresses in New York. By the late 1800s, the street had lost much of its prestige in favor of locations further uptown, yet these grand buildings remained, under the ownership of the Delmonico family. They were then combined to serve a need: the creation of a permanent church for a thriving population. The site has been at the center of Spanish and Latin American heritage for decades, and bears enormous significance as New York City’s very first Spanish language church or church for a Spanish-speaking congregation.

While the church and its congregation were small at the time of their origin at the turn of the century, this by no means diminishes their significance. Our Lady of Guadalupe Church was a cornerstone of a growing community, which had started out years prior as a modest group of Spanish Catholics who settled in the area surrounding West 14th Street. The community, at the time primarily comprising immigrants from Galicia, would come to be known as “Little Spain.”

LPC’s response too easily dismisses the magnitude, size, and lasting heritage of the Little Spain and Latin American community historically associated with this church, by merely stating that “a small Spanish (Iberian) community was established in the West Village south of West 14th Street in the late-19th century and was in decline by the 1920s and 1930s as the community moved uptown.” On the contrary, at its height, the enclave known as “Little Spain” extended from approximately Christopher Street to 23rd Street on the west side, with 14th Street between 7th and 8th Avenues as its core, and was home to thousands of immigrants and dozens of Spanish-owned businesses, social clubs, and religious and community centers. At its peak, Little Spain was the largest Spanish-American community in New York City. It also served as a nexus for Puerto Ricans and Latin American immigrants when other such centers did not exist, and even after they did.

Among the remaining vestiges in the neighborhood today are the Spanish Benevolent Society (La Nacional), founded in 1868 and with its Spanish flag still flying, and the physical body of the church, which was remodeled in 1921 with the present Spanish Colonial Baroque facade addition by architect Gustave E. Steinback. This noteworthy phase of immigrant history deserves to be recognized, and Our Lady of Guadalupe Church is one of its few surviving architectural remnants.

In the letter, LPC noted that “...soon after it was established Our Lady of Guadalupe’s space was considered temporary and insufficient, and inconvenient to an increasingly dispersed Spanish-speaking population that tended to worship in churches closer to their homes, attending Our Lady of Guadalupe primarily for baptisms and weddings.” This is simply untrue. The church actually expanded in 1917 to include the second row house on 14th Street, and in 1921 the grand Spanish Colonial Baroque facade was added to both structures as we see today. Though the solely Spanish population began to diminish in the 1930s, by then other Spanish-speaking communities had come to call this neighborhood home.

Our Lady of Guadalupe Church continued to serve Spanish-speaking parishioners until as recently as the early 2000s, when the significant influx of Mexican immigrants to New York City, which had occurred starting in the 1990s, began to overextend the capacity of the small chapel that the combining of the two brownstones had facilitated. In 2002, the parish relocated just a few hundred feet west to St. Bernard’s Church, located on 14th Street between 8th and 9th Avenues. Prior to the move, neighbors and eyewitnesses recall the overflow of crowds that used to participate in services at the original location. Demand was so high that Mass was sometimes broadcast over loudspeakers to reach a broader audience spilling onto the sidewalk.

LPC further indicated that “the [church] building has since been altered with the removal of historic window and door details, facade resurfacing, and changes to window openings, roofs, and parapets.” Indeed it has, but such minor alterations are typically not considered barriers to designation. Many features of the two original upscale brownstone row houses remain, as does the 1921 facade designed by a famed architect, which reflects the development of the building into its longstanding use as a religious institution.

The first religious home that a community creates is often not the grandest. Like so many other congregations that used methods of adaptive reuse in order to create houses of worship, Our Lady of Guadalupe Church was not purpose-built, but rather crafted by altering existing infrastructure, and the present building tells that story. Places of worship are often among the first dedicated, shared spaces established in a neighborhood, and the physical form is borne of necessity. That is exactly what is memorialized here: a church building that evolved in tandem with a developing community, which was then made more “grand” with its Spanish Colonial Baroque facade when resources permitted.

Historically, many synagogues on the Lower East Side followed a similar model, as have more recently mosques and Hindu and Buddhist temples; likewise, churches of less well-established groups in earlier days typically took over existing houses of worship or created ones out of structures already built for different purposes. These were communities that either a) did not have sufficient resources at the time and needed to work with what was available to them, and/or b) were transient insomuch as they were made up of immigrants or refugees whose permanence was not guaranteed. They would therefore create spaces of safe worship within existing infrastructure. As these communities established more of a permanent presence in their neighborhoods, they took the time, energy, and monetary investment to add grandeur and ornamentation to their sacred spaces.

Finally, LPC asserted that “while [Our Lady of Guadalupe Church] has served a Spanish-speaking community through its history, it has also served other communities, as so many churches across the city do, with services in various languages,” and that “as a result, it does not appear to possess a strong enough association with a specific community to merit consideration for its cultural significance alone.” As an inclusive and welcoming place of worship in one of the most diverse cities in the world, Our Lady of Guadalupe Church certainly may have opened its doors to broader populations throughout its lifetime. However, that does not minimize the continuous value that it had for the core Spanish-speaking community it consistently served for 100 years. The parish never wavered from its original purpose, which was to provide a religious home for its Spanish-speaking congregation — for over a decade, the only place that offered such services in the entire city.

While constituting approximately 30% of NYC’s population, sites designated for their connection to Latino/a, Latinx, and Hispanic peoples and their history and culture account for at most a handful of the 1,456 individual landmarks citywide, or well under 1% of designated individual landmarks. And a comparatively negligible number of the nearly 40,000 interior landmark, scenic landmark, and historic district designations throughout the five boroughs cite such connections as their reason for designation. It would appear the LPC does not have the luxury of dismissing Our Lady of Guadalupe Church as lacking in requisite significance to Latino/a, Latinx, and Hispanic history and heritage when there is such a deficit of other sites that have been recognized, and when so many experts in the field strongly disagree. Our Lady of Guadalupe Church tells the specific story of “Little Spain” and its Spanish and Latin American immigration history, a critical piece of our heritage that may soon be lost to time if the Landmarks Preservation Commission does not act.

Thank you for your reconsideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Andrew Berman
Executive Director, Village Preservation

Deborah J. Glick
NYS Assemblymember 66th Assembly District

Eric Bottcher
NYC Council Member District 3

Jessica Chait
First Vice Chair, Manhattan Community Board 4

Jay DiLorenzo
President, Preservation League of New York State

Frampton Tolbert
Executive Director, Historic Districts Council

Robert Sanfiz
Executive Director La Nacional - Spanish Benevolent Society

Anthony M. Stevens-Arroyo, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Puerto Rican and Latino Studies, Brooklyn College, CUNY

Elena Martinez
Folklorist, City Lore

Brad Hoylman-Sigal
NYS Senator 27th Senate District

Tony Simone
NYS Assemblymember 75th Assembly District

Jeffrey LeFrancois
Chair, Manhattan Community Board 4

Kerry Keenan
Co-Chair, Chelsea Land Use Committee, Manhattan Community Board 4

Peg Breen
President, The New York Landmarks Conservancy

Kitt Garrett
President, Save Chelsea

Mark Wallem
Executive Director, Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archives (ALBA)

Ana María Díaz-Stevens, Ph.D.
Chair of Church and Society and Professor Emerita, Union Theological Seminary, New York City

Orlando José Hernández
Independent writer and Professor Emeritus, Hostos Community College-CUNY

PLNYS Staff
Letter of Support: Brooks-Park Arts and Nature Center 9/7/23

Click here for a PDF of this letter.

September 7, 2023

Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc and Members of the Town Council
Town of East Hampton
159 Pantigo Road
East Hampton, New York 11937

Dear Supervisor Van Scoyoc and Members of the East Hampton Town Board:

The Preservation League of New York State and the National Trust for Historic Preservation are writing to voice our support for the local advocates behind the Brooks-Park Arts and Nature Center (BPANC) and their management plan for the Brooks-Park Home and Studios in Springs.

The Preservation League of New York State empowers all New Yorkers to use historic preservation to enrich their communities, protect their heritage, and build a sustainable future. The National Trust for Historic Preservation works to save America's historic sites; tell the full American story; build stronger communities; and invest in preservation's future. Both of our organizations have identified the James Brooks and Charlotte Park Home and Studios as an incredibly important site worth saving. The Trust listed the Brooks-Park site as one of their 11 Most Endangered Historic Places in 2022, with the League including the site among its Seven to Save shortly after. Since those listings, we have worked closely with the BPANC volunteers and have been continuously impressed by their dedication to creating a vital community asset at the Brooks-Park site.

With the Building Conditions Report from Michael Devonshire of Jan Hird Pokorny Associates recently completed in March of this year, the Town is poised to stabilize, and eventually restore, these buildings. BPANC is ready to work with the Town to find a future for Brooks-Park. Both James Brooks and Charlotte Park were seminal figures in the 20th Century Abstract Expressionist art movement. Their home and studios are a physical testament to their work and this important moment in American history. But the Brooks-Park site is also a place to experience nature, just as James and Charlotte did as they made art there. BPANC seeks to create inclusive educational programming and arts-related activities alongside “the discovery, research, and experience of its eleven undisturbed acres of natural habitat, bringing focus to these two acclaimed artists, the unique community in which they lived and worked, and the trail system that runs through parts of the property.”

We strongly encourage the approval of their management plan and a path forward for the Brooks-Park site.

Sincerely,

Jay DiLorenzo                                                           
President, Preservation League of NYS                    

Seri Worden
Senior Director of Preservation Programs, National Trust for Historic Preservation

Katy Peace
Legislation Reintroduced to Help Revitalize Distressed Homes

This Advocacy Update has been reposted from our colleagues at Preservation Action.

Last month, Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) and Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY) introduced the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act (H.R. 3940, S. 657) in the House. Companion legislation was introduced in the Senate earlier this year. This bill would create a federal tax credit to encourage revitalization of distressed homes. In many parts of the country, the cost of purchasing and renovating a home is greater than the value of the home's sale price. The bill would create a tax credit to cover the cost between building or rehabilitating a home in these areas and the price at which they can be sold, up to 35% of the total development cost. Similar legislation was introduced during the last Congress and garnered significant bipartisan support.

The bill focuses on communities with the greatest need, by targeting distressed areas. This includes neighborhoods with high poverty rates, incomes below the area median income; and home values that are below the metro or state median value. The Neighborhood Homes Coalition put together an interactive map where you can see what neighborhoods could qualify for funding. The Coalition estimates that the bill could lead to 500,000 homes over 10 years being rehabilitated or constructed.

This legislation has the potential to significantly assist owners of historic and older homes. Preservation Action will continue to monitor this important legislation.

FederalPLNYS Staff
Letter of Support: 78-80 St. Mark’s Place (Theatre 80)

June 6, 2023

Hon. Eric Adams, Mayor
New York City Hall, New York, NY 10007

Hon. Sarah Carroll, Chair
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission
1 Centre Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10007

Dear Mayor Adams and Chair Carroll:

On behalf of the Preservation League of New York State, I write to support Village Preservation’s request for an evaluation of 78-80 St. Mark’s Place, most recently home of Theatre 80.

As is well documented in Village Preservation’s Request for Evaluation, the building is linked to the early development of New York City, having been built in the 1840s when St. Mark’s Place was lined by spacious townhouses for prosperous New Yorkers. Later nineteenth- and early twentieth-century residents were associated with the waves of immigration that characterized the East Village in that period.

The building later housed a performance venue with roots in the Prohibition era. In 1959, the Jazz Gallery was opened in the building; in 1964 this was transformed into Theatre 80. As a jazz club and later Off-Off-Broadway theatre, it was associated with notable jazz musicians and actors who performed there, and notably with the premiere of You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown. More recently, the space has served as a revival movie house, then again as a venue for live theater.

I encourage the Landmarks Preservation Commission to carefully consider the notable history and cultural significance of the building at 78-80 St. Mark’s Place. The architecture of this building reflects not architectural purity, but rather the singular quirks of its own history and the multiple, overlapping aspects of its significance; but it is primarily the contributions of this building and its occupants to the culture of the East Village that warrant its consideration for landmark status.

Sincerely,

Katie Eggers Comeau
Vice President for Policy and Preservation

PLNYS Staff
Memo of Support: A.1808 (Zinerman) / S. 224 (Myrie)

The undersigned organizations write in support of A.1808 (Zinerman) / S.224 (Myrie), which proposes to improve access to the NYS Historic Homeowner Rehabilitation Tax Credit for longterm homeowners in historic neighborhoods in New York City. Currently, the credit is only available in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs), which are tracts at or below 100% of the state median family income in the most recent federal census. As numerous neighborhoods in New York City experience economic changes, some former QCTs no longer qualify due to rising income levels. This bill would allow homeowners in NYC who have owned their houses since at least January 1, 2010, and live in a census tract that was a QCT as of January 1, 2017, to use the Historic Homeowner Rehabilitation Tax Credit to offset part of the cost of rehabilitating their houses, even if the tract now exceeds the income limit for QCTs.

When neighborhoods experience rapid increases in income levels and housing costs, long-time homeowners who have contributed to the stability and appeal of their neighborhoods are often at risk of being displaced. Expanding Historic Homeowner Rehabilitation Tax Credit eligibility to longterm owners in gentrifying areas will make the program more equitable and help these owners defray the cost of maintaining and improving their homes.

The Historic Homeowner Rehabilitation Tax Credit is an important tool for owners of historic houses listed in the State and/or National Registers of Historic Places. When they undertake a rehabilitation project costing at least $5,000, they can qualify to claim a tax credit equal to 20% of the project cost. Rehabilitation work can include both interior and exterior projects, when at least 5% of the work is on the exterior of the building. Typical projects include roof, window, and facade repairs, and energy upgrades such as storm window installation and weatherstripping. The tax credits help to defray the cost of caring for these buildings, which require regular maintenance and repair.

Our organizations support this bill, as well as its broader goal of supporting owners who have invested many years in their neighborhoods and wish to continue maintaining their homes. We thank Senator Myrie and Assemblymember Zinerman for their leadership, and urge the Assembly to pass A.1808 in the remaining days of the 2023 legislative session.

New York State’s 2024 Budget Includes Preservation Wins

This week, the extended state budget process is coming to an end, following several extra weeks of negotiations between the Governor and Legislature. Several budget bills have already been passed by the Senate and Assembly, and more are expected imminently, as is the Governor’s signature.

The League is thrilled that a five-year extension of the NYS Historic Commercial and Homeowner Tax Credit Programs is included in the budget agreement. The tax-credit programs were due to expire in 2024, so an extension was necessary to ensure these programs did not sunset. We thank Assemblymember Carrie Woerner and Senator Timothy Kennedy for championing this extension, and thank the Governor, Senate, and Assembly for all including the extension in their budget proposals and ensuring its inclusion in the final agreement.

The “White Elephant Program,” also proposed by Assemblymember Carrie Woerner and Senator Ted Kennedy, did not make it into the final budget. This program aims to facilitate the rehabilitation of large, vacant buildings that often languish due to their high rehab costs and scarcity of investors. We understand our legislative sponsors intend to work toward passage of the white elephant program as a standalone bill in the remainder of this session, and we will continue advocacy efforts toward that goal.

We are pleased that the budget bills now in the process of being passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor include provisions to protect remains in unmarked burial sites that are discovered on private property. The League has advocated for the establishment of such a process for the last several years, inspired in part by our Seven to Save listing of Elmhurst African American Burial Ground in Queens in 2020.

A similar bill that passed the Legislature last year was vetoed by the Governor, citing what she saw as inadequate protections for private property owners. The bill establishes a process and timeline for the remains to be protected, the appropriate descendants or culturally affiliated groups notified, and a resolution to be worked out between the descendants and the property owner as to keeping the remains in place or moving them to a different location. New in this bill is that if the culturally affiliated group and property owner cannot come to an agreement – if the descendants want the remains to stay in place and the property owner wants to remove them, for example – the property owner can, after 90 days, pay to have them removed in a respectful manner, with the culturally affiliated group having the right to monitor the removal. We are grateful for the efforts of former Assemblymember Steve Englebright, who had championed this issue for many years, and Assemblymember Fred Thiele, who sponsored the revised bill that was incorporated into the budget. We also acknowledge the efforts of Indigenous activists who have worked tirelessly in support of this long overdue legislation.

The New York State Council on the Arts (NYSCA), an important partner to the League, has announced that their FY 2024 budget allocation is $110 million; their available funding for FY24 grants is $127 million ($90 million for organizations and artists, plus $37 million in capital project funding). NYSCA’s funding has seen significant bumps the last few years in recognition of the need to invest in the recovery of the arts sector; while this year’s funding is not as high as last year’s historic peak of $140 million, it does recognize the state’s ongoing commitment to the arts, and improves significantly on the original executive budget proposal. We join NYSCA in thanking the Governor and Legislature for their leadership in investing in New York’s important arts sector.

The budget also includes $400 million for the Environmental Protection Fund (EPF), plus $200 million in capital funding the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to invest in enhancing state parks. We will share details of funding for historic preservation as those become available.

Letter of Support from the League and National Trust following Building Conditions Report of Brooks-Park

Click here for a PDF of this support letter.

April 3, 2023

Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc and Members of the Town Board
Town of East Hampton
159 Pantigo Road
East Hampton, New York 11937

Dear Supervisor Van Scoyoc and Members of the East Hampton Town Board,

The National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Preservation League of New York State were pleased to learn that Michael Devonshire of Jan Hird Pokorny Associates presented a Building Conditions Report of the James Brooks and Charlotte Park Studios and Residence to the East Hampton Town Board on March 21, 2023.

We understand that the Town Council was supportive of the Building Conditions Report, expressing a desire to stabilize and restore the property. Our organizations, along with local, statewide, and national advocates, are requesting clarity on next steps and a timeline to preserve this collection of historically significant structures where Charlotte Park and James Brooks, two very important Abstract Expressionist artists, lived and worked.

The report notes that “the rich cultural importance of the Brooks Park association with the site renders it deserving [of] a restorative approach, emphasizing a period of interpretation of the 1970s-1990s be taken, in order to retain as much as possible of the artifactual remains of the buildings in which these two immensely gifted artists performed their acts of creation.” We could not agree more and urge the Town to take meaningful steps to ensure the long-term preservation and re-use of this property.

We continue to have serious concern for the buildings’ condition if they remain poorly maintained, and urge, in the strongest possible terms, the Town of East Hampton to take swift and significant steps to stabilize and protect the Brooks-Park Studios and Residence, while determining a restoration plan. The Town has the authority as well as the funding necessary to stabilize the buildings, through the Peconic Bay Region Community Preservation Fund.

We thank you for your ongoing attention to the future of the Brooks Park Home and Studios and we look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Seri Worden
Senior Field Director, National Trust for Historic Preservation

Katie Eggers Comeau
VP for Policy and Preservation, Preservation League of NYS

NYS Budget Proposals

The New York State Assembly and Senate released their budget proposals on March 14, following the release of the Executive budget proposal in January.

  • The Preservation League is pleased that the Senate and Assembly budget proposals both include a five-year extension of the NYS Historic Tax Credit programs, as does the Executive budget proposal released in January. Securing an extension is our top priority for the current legislative session, as these programs are due to expire at the end of 2024. We thank the Governor, Senate, and Assembly for recognizing the importance of the Historic Tax Credits in supporting the reuse of existing buildings as a sustainable form of economic development. 

  • We are also pleased that the Assembly budget proposal includes most of the provisions of the proposed “White Elephant” tax-credit program introduced by Assemblymember Carrie Woerner and Senator Tim Kennedy. This program is designed to facilitate the rehabilitation of large, vacant buildings, such as the Central Warehouse in Albany and Central Terminal in Buffalo, by introducing a higher credit cap and other enhancements for challenging projects meeting specific size and vacancy criteria. We are working with the legislative sponsors and allies, including the New York State Alliance for Affordable Housing (NYSAFAH), to support this program and to encourage the adoption of additional provisions to strengthen the HTC’s effectiveness as a tool for the creation of affordable housing. 

  • Arts organizations are essential to the economic health of communities throughout New York; the League is among the many arts and cultural organizations statewide that benefit from partnership with the New York State Council on the Arts. We are pleased that both the Senate and Assembly proposals reverse drastic cuts to NYSCA outlined in the Governor’s budget, and hope the three parties will adopt the Assembly’s proposal of $129 million in total funding to NYSCA.

  • We were disappointed to learn that the Governor’s budget proposal includes a $1 million reduction in funding for parks, historic sites, and the Historic Preservation Grant Program in the Environmental Protection Fund (EPF). We are cautiously optimistic that this funding will be restored, and are awaiting news on how these programs fared in the Senate and Assembly budget proposals. 

With all three budget proposals complete, the parties will now work toward enactment of a final budget. We thank Governor Hochul, Senate Leader Stewart-Cousins, and Assembly Speaker Heastie for leading this process and hope for continued good news for historic preservation in the final budget.

NYSPLNYS Staff
We Need Your Help: EPF & HTC Advocacy

We have two important opportunities this week to make your voice heard in support of historic preservation in New York State!

1. Speak out against proposed cuts to Historic Preservation funding in the Environmental Protection Fund

While the Governor’s budget proposal includes robust funding for the Environmental Protection Fund overall, a closer look at the numbers reveals a proposed $1 million cut to the Historic Preservation Grant Program within the EPF. This program is one of the few sources of bricks-and-mortar funding for preservation projects in our state, and the need is much greater than the available funding every year. To see a list of preservation projects funded through the this grant program last year, click here, scroll to page 15, and look at the projects under "OPRHP EPF HP."

We’re asking all preservation advocates to reach out to their state legislators this week; please ask Assemblymembers to contact Assemblymember Daniel O’Donnell, Chair of the Committee on Tourism, Parks, Arts & Sports Development, and Senators to contact Senator José Serrano, Chair of the Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks & Recreation, with the following simple request: "Please do not allow cuts to the Historic Preservation Grant Program in the Environmental Protection Fund."  If you know of a project in your area that received this funding in recent years, or found one on the list in the link above, please use it as an example of the great work being supported by this grant program.

2. Call in support of the HTC Extension and “White Elephant” Bill (A.2889 / S.4174)

Assemblymember Carrie Woerner and Senator Tim Kennedy have proposed a 10-year extension to the NYS Historic Tax Credits and additional provisions to facilitate the use of the commercial credit for the rehabilitation of large, vacant buildings (“white elephants”). We want to line up as many co-sponsors for the legislation as possible, to demonstrate broad support for including this language in the state budget. While you are reaching out to legislators regarding the Historic Preservation grant funding cut, please also ask if they would be willing to co-sponsor A.2889 / S.4174 to support the extension and enhancement of the NYS Historic Tax Credits.

Calls and emails on both of these issues will be most helpful before March 13. Thank you for your advocacy!

NYS, Tax CreditsPLNYS Staff